Chris Moneymaker condemns alleged RTA use as poker cheating debate intensifies

Chris Moneymaker condemns alleged RTA use as poker cheating debate intensifies

Chris Moneymaker has condemned the alleged use of TrenirusGTO as “blatant cheating”, while Patrick 'Pads' Leonard and Matt Berkey warned about the growing threat from AI-enabled RTA tools.

Video prompts reactions

The poker community has reacted to a viral video involving TrenirusGTO, with several players warning that real-time assistance (RTA) tools pose a growing threat to online game integrity.

UK professional Patrick 'Pads' Leonard described the situation as "very scary". He said the material circulating publicly represented less than 1% of the wider RTA issue that regular online players had been discussing over the previous week.

Matt Berkey focused on the role of artificial intelligence in making advanced tools easier to create. He argued that the key question was no longer whether RTA was being used, but how useful the real-time information supplied to players had become.

"With how easy it is to build tools using AI now, it's not really a question of if there is RTA going on," Berkey wrote. "It probably hasn't been a question for years. The real question is how good is the real-time information they receive."

Berkey said he found it difficult to imagine an outcome in which operators and cheats did not capture the money generated by the activity.

Moneymaker calls use “blatant cheating”

ACR ambassador Chris Moneymaker addressed TrenirusGTO directly, rejecting the idea that the technology improves a player's ability. He said it amounted to cheating and warned that players caught using it would have their funds confiscated.

"This s**t is not improving your game. It is blatant cheating and anyone caught using it will have their funds confiscated," Moneymaker wrote.

The dispute adds to the wider technology battle between online poker operators and players seeking an advantage through prohibited tools. The latest controversy has drawn particular attention because the software provider is itself openly promoting a use of its product that is not allowed.

The reaction reflects concern that AI is making increasingly sophisticated assistance systems easier to develop. Players now face the prospect of a continuing escalation between those building detection systems and those attempting to evade them, leaving operators under pressure to respond.

ACR issued a statement in connection with the controversy, although the available details do not set out its contents.